Lost Male Drivers Waste $3,000 In Gas, Study Finds

(Sept. 3) — Men waste more than $3,000 in fuel costs because they refuse to question for directions when lost, according to a British study released as motorists across the U.S. prepare to load up their cars for the long Labor Day weekend.

Read more: Gas Prices, Lost Drivers, Transportation, Travel News

Laura Flanders: The F Word: Accepting Defeat in Iraq

Everyone is spinning the Iraq mission’s so-called end but no one seems willing quite to accept defeat.

Republicans are complaining that the president didn’t mention George W. Bush often enough in his speech announcing the end of combat operations. In fact, he did, quite a bit, and in an over-generous way, most sane people agree. As GRITtv commentator Bill Fletcher, Jr. place it Wednesday, "Iraq wasn’t a case of a war gone terrible with excellent intentions — it was begun illegally and handled incorrect from the start."

The people who got the shortest shrift in the president’s speech were the Iraqis. In particular, the Iraqi parliament. Obama made much of the fact that was following through on a promise to bring combat troops out of Iraq (for which he’s clearly hoping to score election points) but there was only one oblique reference to the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) which really forces US combat troops to place.

The timeline, terms and the troop draw-down stipulated in SOFA were signed by U.S. and Iraqi officials on Nov. 16, 2008 and have stood as the law of the land ever since. As the U.S. right proclaimed the surge a success; so too, Democrats now claiming credit for a withdrawal they didn’t really have much choice about. (Certainly not if they are going to claim credit for Iraqi democracy at the same time.)

And then there’s the Left. With over 50,000 troops remaining — and the largest embassy on the planet — some on the left are pushing the claim that the U.S. maintains a grip. Uncle Alexander argues that, to the contrary, in terms of every goal set for the invasion — result WMD, building democracy, accessing oil, building peace — the U.S. invasion has been a total defeat. (Uncle Alexander found Reuters’ account of Iraq’s oil auctions fascinating reading.)

Alexander, it seems to me, is right: better we come to grips with defeat than concede that a lawless operation in some way won and made the U.S. stronger. It didn’t. Iraq’s in ruins. Afghanistan’s next. America’s bent, killer appetite for conquest does us — and the world — no excellent.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Read more: Well loved, F Word, October 2, Alexander Cockburn, Obama, Iraq, The Nation, Grit Tv, United for Peace and Justice, Election, Bush, The F Word, Labor, Movement, Laura Flanders, Populist, Bill Fletcher Jr., Grittv, Washington, Glenn Beck, Politics News

Susan Harrow: Online Ads: Can They Ruin Your Reputation?

Perhaps. If not handled carefully.

I visited an Aikido site that appeared to be run by a serious teacher who stated that he was “an author and Aikido instructor, 6 dan Aikikai.” He also teaches the sword art iaido. He seemed to have substantial credentials but as I scrolled down his home page there was an ad for an Asian dating site where I could browse photos.

Although Aikido is a physical training that can feel intimate given the close body contact mixing carnal thoughts with the rigors of self mastery felt inappropriate.

In addition, the subhead of this Aikido site was “the peaceful martial art.” The video clearly demonstrated what the website’s owner had a certain level of mastery, but all of that excellent will and trust was shattered when I saw a photo of a comely young Asian girl thrusting out her chest invitingly.

The next Google ad that popped up was from a firearms training institute, which made me question myself is this in keeping with the author’s promise of promoting “a peaceful martial art?” As much as Aikido is Budo it doesn’t advocate guns as part of its martial practice, so it goes hostile to one of the core teachings of peacefulness.

I imagine that this instructor may have no thought that these Google ads are viewable on his site since they rotate regularly — yet it warrants attention, the same close attention that’s paid to practice, attitude and comportment — in and out of the dojo (training hall). Part of the way of life of Aikido is to consistently carry your training off the mat into your life to live a harmonious existence.

In an instant your reputation can be hampered or ruined with such simple thoughtlessness. I remember one accomplished senpai (mentor or teacher) in our dojo losing his temper quite dramatically when he hit his head on the wall taking ukemi (the art of falling or dependability a roll) when he was thrown. Even as it didn’t ruin his credibility as a teacher, his intense rage and outburst did give me intermission. We are all creature after all. Still, it says something about his reputation.

Everything you do, say, are and reckon from your words to your website add up to the message you give to the world. One of Benjamin Franklin’s 12 Rules of Management is, “Deliberately cultivate your reputation and legacy.” Don’t be silly about making a few pennies from your website at the expense of your business, your reputation and ultimately your legacy.

Read more: Google, Ads, Branding, Advertisements, Internet Safety, Reputation, Google Ads, Branding Identity, Living News

Lost Male Drivers Waste $3,000 In Gas, Study Finds

(Sept. 3) — Men waste more than $3,000 in fuel costs because they refuse to question for directions when lost, according to a British study released as motorists across the U.S. prepare to load up their cars for the long Labor Day weekend.

Read more: Gas Prices, Lost Drivers, Transportation, Travel News

Vivian Norris de Montaigu: Restoring Trust Is the First Step Forward to Heal from the Financial Crisis

Why did I vote for President Obama? I trusted him, and I still do. Why do so many Americans want Elizabeth Lair in a position of power and financial choice-making? Because they trust her to tell them the certainty and do right by them. Why is the Banker to the Poor, Muhammad Yunus (who earns around 400 euros per month) trusted by millions around the world, yet the CEOs, CFOs and Presidents of major financial institutions are not only not trusted, they are despised? It all comes down to trust. Fool me once, bring shame on on you, fool me twice, bring shame on on me. And I don’t want to be fooled again. Neither do 300 million Americans. Neither does much of the rest of the world.

In other words, we are over these guys in suits with their private jets and trophy wives. We are over the tennis buddy behind the scenes deal making insider information trading buying our politicians and leaving us with the bill and our president with a mess to clean up…it stops now.

Irreverently, the very word for “credit” credire…means to believe in or trust. Trust is behind the entire concept of banking. What do the poorest of the poor in Muhammad Yunus Microcredit world and the wealthiest financial institutions have in common? Access to credit with no collateral to back up the loans. Yet the poorest of the poor in the Grameen Bank world pay back at rates as high as 99%. Those huge banks not only did not pay back, they took from us and paid themselves bonuses. Hmmm…guess they aren’t very excellent bankers are they? Because they have ruined the very trust they need to get us to give them our money, invest it and give us something back. It feels like they are, well, stealing our money doesn’t it?

Perhaps the reason there is still trust in Dr Yunus’ world is because 98% of the poorest of the poor Grameen borrowers who are trying to make better lives for themselves and their children are women? Yunus noticed that women paid back better than the men, and used the money and profits from their small businesses to help their families so he focused on loaning to them. It is looking like most of the mess in the Western financial world is being caused by a handful of men, men with inflated egos, Narcissists so removed from how most people live their lives that one starts to feel that they really believe they are somehow not entirely creature.

But the fact is, they are creature, just like all of the rest of us. And we simply do not trust them anymore, and most likely never will again. So let’s get the investors and board members and depositors to exchange things, shake it up, remove these guys and place some women in charge, and those in whom we really have trust again.

Then and only then will America have a banking system worth believing in, and until then, well, it’s sweet much Us hostile to Them. And I have a sweet strong feeling They are going to Lose. Because there are more of us, and we really are rediscovering our power both politically and economically. Go your money. Call your representatives. Educate your children about the political process. Rebuild your communities and help those in need. There are so many people not result work after losing their jobs. There is so much excellent will and energy among young people who want to remain optimistic about their future. America will be total again and it will be even better now that we have woken up from this fantasy.

Turn off the TV. Dust off your bicycle. Have a block party and get to know your neighbors. Grow a garden. Learn to cook really healthful meals. Spend time with your partner and children. Read! It is time to slow down and go around things. Use this time wisely. Become informed about the world. You are more powerful than you know. You can make a choice and act on it. Once you shift your perspective and take proceedings, everything starts to shift. If we all do it together, a wave of excellent will and rebuilding will take root. It already is.

P.S. — After taking a real vacation this summer, turning off the cell phone and disconnecting from email, I realized how very vital it is to make time for dependability nothing in peacefulness to come back re-energized and with new thoughts. Check out some of them here.

And at Vigilante-vnm.com and on Twitter

Read more: Microcredit, Credit, Trust, Grameen Bank, Elizabeth Lair, Ceos, Banks, Financial Crisis, Obama, Wall Street, Muhammad Yunus, Vigilante-Vnm, Business News

Les Leopold: Why the Big Lie About the Job Crisis?

The August unemployment facts are hideous, yet again. Nearly 29 million Americans are still jobless or forced into part-time jobs. The Bureau of Labor Statistics official unemployment rate is 9.6%. It’s borader and more telling jobless rate (U6) of 16.7% confirms that we’re stuck in our own version of the Fantastic Depression. We’ll need more than 22 million new jobs to bring us back to full-employment. Pleased Labor Day.

To get out of this dilemma we’ll have to face up to two fundamental facts:

1. We really are in the midst of a horrific jobs crisis. All the pleased talk about the economy being on the road to recovery is just plain ancient denial. We’ll never find jobs for all the people who desperately need them until we recognize that this employment crisis poses a clear and present danger to our republic. Modern capitalist societies require full employment. When we don’t have it for long periods of time, chaos ensues. What’s missing in Washington is a sense of urgency. Denial is perilous — and an insult to the unemployed.

2. We must face up to the real causes of this mess. Unfortunately, a lot of Americans are succumbing to a incorrect-headed narrative that has been pushed into our heads:

“We Americans sank ourselves in debt. We consumed more than we produced. We bought homes we couldn’t afford and used them as ATMs. Of course Wall Street did its part by offering us mortgages they knew we couldn’t really afford. The government also contributed mightily by pushing Fannie and Freddie, the giant housing agencies, to bankroll “politically right” loans to low-returns residents who shouldn’t have been buying homes at all. In small, we all are to blame.”

From a flawed narrative always comes a flawed policy prescription:

“The era of excess is over. We need to cut back on spending and borrowing. We need to reduce government debt by raising the Social Wellbeing retirement age and cutting social programs We’ve got to streamline our broadcast sector by laying off broadcast employees and cutting back their lavish pensions. And all staff will have to exchange to an era of intense foreign competition: We’ve got to reduce our wage and benefit demands if our companies are going to compete globally. We have to live within our means.”

In small, we gorged ourselves until the economy crashed. Now we’ve got to tighten our belts and accept less to get it going again. It’s simple and logical and…..dead incorrect.

Collective guilt is always seductive. It may even be programmed into our genes. It’s possible that prehistoric homo sapiens survived by sharing blame in hard times. But that calming instinct does not serve us well today. We need to know the certainty behind this crisis if we’re going to come close to solving it.

For starters, “we” didn’t make this mess. Wall Street did, with the help of politicians who pushed through financial deregulation and an increasingly regressive tax structure that place outrageous sums of money in the hands of a few. Freed from regulations and flooded with money, Wall Street bankers went crazy. And before long, our economy crashed.

It really is that simple. Starting in the late 1970s our country embarked on a grand real-time experiment to “unleash” the economy from government rules and oversight. The theory was that to end the era of “stagflation,” we had to cut taxes on the super-rich, freeing them to lead a gargantuan investment boom that would of course lift all boats. At the same time, the financial sector was liberated from its New Deal-era shackles. Yes, those constraints had prevented a financial crash for more than 40 years. But now, argued the best and the brightest, the new world peacefulness required a more nimble financial sector. Naturally, the markets could police themselves.

In retrospect it seems like a very terrible joke.

Really, the plot did work perfectly for the top one percent of us. In fact, these excessively wealthy people laughed all the way to the bank. America’s distribution of returns, which had been reasonably equitable during the post WWII era, flew apart. In 1970 the top 100 CEOs earned about $45 for every dollar earned by the average worker. By 2008 it was $1,081 to one.

With so much wealth in hand, the super-rich literally ran out of tangible goods and service industries to invest in. There simply was too much capital seeking too few real investments. And what a honey pot that proved to be for Wall Street’s financial engineers! Freed from any limits on constructing complex new financial products, hedge funds and too-huge-to-fail banks and investment houses made an alphabet soup of new securities with the sky-high yields the super-rich craved. The rating agencies abetted the crime by blessing these flimsy products with AA and AAA ratings.

Wall Street built this flim-flam of finance out of junk debt — like sub-prime mortgages — which it could pool, slice, and resell for enormous profits. In fact, selling these bogus securities was the most profitable enterprise in the history of Wall Street. Wall Street wrapped credit default swaps and collateralized debt obligations into sweet packages so that they could literally sell the same underlying junk assets again and again. It was through these marvelous feats of financial engineering that a $300 billion sub-prime crisis turned into a multi-trillion dollar catastrophe. (Check out The Looting of America for all the gory details.) And that’s how, the huge bankers — not us — pumped up the largest housing bubble in history. Wall Street didn’t need Fannie or Freddie or low-returns homebuyers. It just needed deregulation, a lot of super-rich people with money to burn, and junk debt it could spin into AAA gold.

The total scheme worked just fine as long as the underlying collateral (our homes) appreciated year after year. But as soon as housing prices peaked, it was game over. The upside-down pyramid of debt and junk financial instruments came crashing down. The entire credit system froze, tearing a gaping hole in the real economy. Eight million jobs were ruined in a matter of months.

The cause of the crash is no mystery. The Fantastic Depression happened the same way: a skewed distribution of returns combined with a deregulated financial sector made a huge bubble, and it burst. The only way to break the cycle is to attack those fundamental causes — we need to go money from the very top of the returns ladder to the middle and the bottom, and we need to tie Wall Street up in regulatory knots.

Through steep progressive taxes on the super-wealthy, honest returns taxes on hedge funds and transaction fees on Wall Street’s proprietary trading, we can keep that bubble from reinflating — and in the process bring to somebody’s attention the money we need to place America back to work. With the revenue we collect, we can hire millions of people to weatherize homes and buildings and rebuild our infrastructure. Instead of laying off teachers we can hire more, and grant them with better training and support. We can expand universities and colleges too, and allow people to go to college for free, which will improve our peoples’ skills — and keep young people off the unemployment rolls.

Of course all this would be costly in the small run. But progressive taxes on the super-rich and a windfall tax on Wall Street profits and bonuses would pay for it all, and then some. The American people would know that it’s only honest to require the super-rich (whom we just bailed out) to fund the jobs they helped ruin through their reckless financial gambling. And in the long run, investing in infrastructure and education will make our country richer. Just look at the GI Bill: Giving returning WWII vets a free college education was expensive — but Congress later found that every dollar washed-out on the program yielded a return to our economy of $6.90.

Are we really justified in reclaiming this wealth from Wall Street? Well, it’s our wealth, isn’t it? We just gave it to them. I’m talking about the nearly $10 trillion (not a typo) we shelled out to financial institutions in loans, asset guarantees, market supports, low-interest loans and a myriad of other forms of help as part of our rescue of the financial system. Now, thanks to our largess, the bankers are back to making record profits and bonuses again. Even President Obama, who helped persuade the total deal, is apparently aghast. In his new book Capital Offense, Michael Hirsch quotation marks Obama at a White House meeting in December 2009:

“Wait, let me get this straight. These guys are reserving record bonuses because they’re profitable, and they’re profitable only because we rescued them.”

During 2009, the worst economic year since the Depression, the top ten hedge fund honchos averaged $900,000 an hour (that’s $1.8 billion each per year). And they did it only because we saved their butts from total end. Now it’s payback time. The bankers owe the American people hard cold cash, not just the promise of a fantastic trickle down in the distant future.

Incredibly, Wall Street executives are howling over every proposal to limit their profits or, god forbid, stick them with part of the bill for all the hurt they’ve caused. They refuse to admit that they’ve done anything incorrect. In fact they feel victimized. They seem to believe that skimming billions from our financial system via taxpayer bailouts is a excellent thing for everyone. Can they really believe that if we just left them alone, new jobs would flow like wine?

Wall Street billionaire Steve Schwarzman got spitting mad when a name suggested that we close his favorite tax loophole (carried interest which allows him to pay a much lower tax rate than the rest of us). That would be “like when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939,” he fumed.

Let’s stay with his regrettable analogy. Surely Schwarzman knows that Hitler rode to power in 1932 on the back of Germany’s fantastic unemployment crisis. And surely he knows that a fantastic jobs programs funded by taxes on the even more-rich is a far better alternative.

It’s time to say “the end” to the “We’re all to blame” fairytale. Let’s start a new tale this Labor Day. It’s called, “Place our people back to work.”

Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street’s Game of Fantasy Finance ruined our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009.

Read more: CEO Pay, Wall Street Crisis, Unemployment, Labor Day, Bailout, Hedge Funds, Steven Schwarzman, Fantastic Recession, President Obama, Financial Crisis, Billionaires, Fantastic Depression, Business News

Sen. Ron Wyden: Missing the Point

In December of 2006, I introduced the Healthful Americans Act to reform the nation’s health care system. Some on both sides of the aisle liked my bill, even as others on both sides of the aisle did not. But the time has long since passed for debating the merits of the Healthful Americans Act. Even as I like to reckon that the legislation I washed-out many years developing helped advance and inform last existence debate, it became sweet clear at the beginning of 2009 that the White House and the Congressional leadership of both parties wanted to go a different way.

It’s right that I wanted health reform to do more to make choices and promote competition. But instead of spending the year on the sidelines criticizing my colleagues and advocating for my personal approach, I washed-out the year looking for opportunities to improve the legislation that WAS advancing through Congress. The same can be said of my health advocacy today, as I continue to look for ways to improve what is now law.

For example, in writing the Healthful Americans Act and working with the Congressional Budget Office on its score, I learned that giving consumers more choices is one of the most powerful ways to reduce health insurance costs and hold insurance companies accountable. Even as I certainly didn’t get everything that I wanted, I did get a provision built-in in the final bill that will allow a small group of Americans to convert their tax-excluded employer subsidies into vouchers that they can use to choose their own plans on the new health insurance exchanges. And I am already looking for opportunities to expand this provision so that more and more Americans are ultimately empowered to make their own health care choices.

Another provision that I got built-in in the final law came directly from my original legislative proposal. “Empowering States to be Innovative” (Section 632 in the Healthful Americans Act and Section 1332 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) reflects my long held view that when it comes to health policy what works best for people in Tampa Bay, Florida doesn’t always work as well for the residents of Coos Bay, Oregon. My state of Oregon has, in fact, long led the country in innovating approaches that have played a major factor in Oregon having some of the highest quality and buck cost health care in the country. So both in writing my legislation and working to improve what is now law, I wanted to make it possible for states to keep innovating new approaches.

Though, for states to really be empowered to be innovative the federal government has to be willing to give states a small leeway to implement their own approaches. A state, for example, can’t offer a broadcast option on its exchange if it has to follow the exact standards of the federal law that doesn’t grant for one. Similarly, states can’t hold health insurance costs down by joining other states to form “regional exchanges” with larger risk pools if they have to follow the federal law that requires that exchanges be state based. And, of course, no state-based approach — no matter how innovative — can work if everyone who participates in the state program gets fined by the federal government for failing to comply with the federal mandate.

So, in both the Healthful Americans Act and in the current health reform law, I built-in a provision that would allow states to gain an exemption from certain federal requirements — such as the party mandate, the employer penalty and the exact standards for designing the exchanges, subsidies and basic health insurance policies — if they could find a way to do a better job of covering their state’s citizens. And I have been working to help states, like my home state of Oregon, take advantage of this option and hopefully go-up the date when states can start applying for waivers. The reason for this — as the legislators in my state will attest — is that it’s a lot less cost effective for states to implement their own approaches in 2017 if they also have to pay to implement the federally mandated approach in 2014. For those who claim this position represents a retreat from the health reform law, they are mistaken. I have been advocating virtually non-stop for states to have the right to go their own way, counting during the Senate Finance Committee’s mark-up up last fall when I got the provision built-in in the Senate bill. My letter to the state of Oregon last week was a continuation of my effort to promote state innovation in health care.

Of course, the temptation in today’s gotcha political culture is to take any senator’s comments on health care as being about scoring political points and either helping or hurting the White House. The certainty here is that I have supported both an party mandate and a state waiver for more than five years.

Again, both the party mandate and the state waiver were a part of legislation that I introduced in 2006. And even as this provision would allow states to opt-out of the federal health insurance mandate — which is what some politically motivated people are calling for right now — under my approach states will only be granted a waiver if they exhibit they can do a better job of providing health care in their state than under the new federal law. To date, I haven’t seen a single one of those states currently filing lawsuits hostile to the party mandate propose better ways of covering their citizens. In fact, one of the reasons I have been drawing attention to the state waiver is to highlight the insincerity of those filing lawsuits. If states aren’t pleased with the federal law they must be spending their energy innovating ways to do better rather than wasting taxpayer dollars on lawsuits that — if successful — would place their state’s citizens with nothing.

I continue to support the party mandate except a state can exhibit that it will grant copy or better health care without one. I continue to prefer the party mandate from the Wyden-Bennett bill to the one contained in the bill that passed, because it was accompanied by greater consumer choice and a rock-solid guarantee that all Americans would receive the same level of health coverage as their Member of Congress.

I voted for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, not because I thought it was the best we could do, but because I thought it was a total lot better than the current system. I still know that to be right. But in my mind, passing that law is far from “mission accomplished” and my constituents can count on me to keep working to improve that law and our nation’s health care system, regardless of which way the political winds may be blowing.

Read more: Party Mandate, White House, Politics, Ron Wyden, free-choice-amendment”>Wyden Free Choice Amendment, Wall Street Journal, Health Reform, Oregon, Politics News

Milla Jovovich, Pregnant Ali Larter & Wentworth Miller In Japan (PHOTOS)

The stars of ‘Inhabitant Evil: Afterlife’ took the film to Tokyo on Thursday.

Stars Milla Jovovich, Wentworth Miller and an adorably pregnant Ali Larter premiered the film in Tokyo. Larter announced in July that she and husband Hayes MacArthur are expecting their first child together.

The film opens in the US on September 10.





Read more: Wentworth Miller, Film, Inhabitant Evil: Afterlife, Ali Larter Pregnant, Ali Larter, Milla Jovovich, Japan, Entertainment News

Stacie Krajchir: The Sexiest Pools to Take a Plunge

The Sexiest Pools To Take a Plunge

There’s no argument, hotel pools are downright exciting; there’s something slightly tempting about all that glistening water set in a myriad of unfamiliar and seductive surroundings.

Some pools are hailed for their exclusive design or location, others for privacy, and of course there are those renowned solely for it’s serious social scene. Regardless of your pool personality, take a plunge into some of the world’s poshest pools.

Read more: Jackson Hole, South Africa, Thailand, France, India, Miami, Iceland, Bali, Swimming Pools, Slidepollajax, Travel News

Rabbi Steve Gutow: What the Peace Talks Need

As the leaders of Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, and Jordan meet in Washington this week to start the first direct peace talks in 20 months, the deliberate and flagrant murders by Hamas in Hebron remind us of the urgency, and conundrum, of the task at hand. Radical voices continue to call for vengeance and promise more violence, but what the Israelis and the Palestinians need today is resolve. Resolve from their leaders and citizens to persevere in the face of prolonged talks and painful concessions. Resolve from the US government to work as hard to help the parties reach a settlement as they did in bringing them to the table. And resolve from their allies internationally and in civil society to bring the support of a domestic constituency to embrace the need for flexibility, persistence, and a two state solution.

The pursuit of peace has never been without its detractors. We saw this in 1995 when Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated by an extremist opposed to Oslo and we saw it this week in Hamas’s proud announcement that this would be only the first of many attacks aimed at discouraging talks. But the future of Israel and Palestine will not be written by the extremists, nor will their horrific violence in Hebron highjack the process.

Which brings us back to resolve. Already the skeptics on both sides are sounding alarms about rejectionist attitudes or impossible conditions. But opportunities are running out. We cannot risk long-lasting what Prime Minister Netanyahu has called the “circle of grief.” These talks represent a rare opportunity, which must not be allowed to go to waste.

It was in that spirit that the Jewish Assembly for Broadcast Affairs (JCPA) joined with the American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP) to call upon the parties to persevere in their negotiations and to support an active role for the US in facilitating an agreement, which would lead to an independent and viable Palestinian state living in peace alongside an Israel with secure and internationally recognized borders. Joining two centrist, pro-two state American Jewish and Palestinian groups is the antithesis of what happened in Hebron. We need to show the detractors on our right and our left that a two state solution is not just preferred, it’s possible. That the hope for the future of both states lies at the negotiating table and not in violence or economic or diplomatic aggression.

The mainstream must have as much resolve as those on the extreme have despise. This process will be long and hard, but concrete steps in the small term can build confidence, advance the talks, and exhibit the benefits of continued engagement. The US and international community must continue to help the Palestinian Authority strengthen its economy and wellbeing infrastructure, as it must be expected to work harder hostile to incitement and terrorism.

A successful peace process will not just benefit the Israelis and the Palestinians. America has a vital interest in this as well. Restarting these negotiations was a success, but they will ruin again without continued US involvement. Both President Obama and Secretary Clinton have promised this, but it has required a US hand to bring both sides to the table and it will require that same steadying and supportive hand to guide talks towards a successful outcome ending over six decades of conflict.

Attacks like those in Hebron were designed to dishearten us, but our resolve will not falter. Developing a domestic movement for peace is crucial in buttressing confidence building measures, even as building a coalition of centrists will allow us to revive our communities around the call for two states – denouncing inflammatory and counterproductive calls for divestment and boycotts or violence and incitement.

It’s time to go forward and exhibit that peace, even as hard to achieve, is not a fantasy and that a mainstream Jewish and Palestinian coalition can fill the broadcast square with messages of hope and support. A shared commitment to peace and wellbeing can steel us all for the talks ahead.

Rabbi Steve Gutow is the President of the Jewish Assembly for Broadcast Affairs. For more information and updates, visit jewishpublicaffairs.org and follow @theJCPA on Twitter.

Read more: Palestinians, Hillary Clinton, Israel, Peace, Barack Obama, Israel-Palestinian Conflict, Politics News